Original article / research
Year :
2014 |
Month :
June
|
Volume :
3 |
Issue :
2 |
Page :
22 - 27 |
Full Version
|
|
Phenotypic Tests for Detecting Incidence of Metallo-Β-Lactamase (Mbl ) Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Jaipur
|
Smita Sood 1. Microbiologist, Department of Laboratory Medicine (SRL Ltd.) Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur.
|
|
Correspondence
Address :
Smita Sood, Dr. Smita Sood
3Kha 4 A, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, India.
E-mail : drsmitasood@yahoo.co.in
|
| ABSTRACT | | : Background: Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) mediated resistance to carbapenems is an emerging threat in hospital isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Prompt detection and recognition of MBLs is important for timely implementation of infection control interventions and treatment with alternative antimicrobials. There is limited information from the state of Rajasthan regarding the prevalence of such enzymes.
Objectives: A study was conducted to determine the prevalence of metallo – β – lactamases (MBLs) in clinical strains of Psuedomonas aeruginosa and to compare three phenotypic tests as a method for MBL detection.
Material And Methods: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from various clinical specimens at a tertiary care private hospital in Jaipur city, which tested resistant to imipenem, were tested for MBL production using three phenotypic tests: double disc synergy test, disc potentiation test and thiol based compound test.
Result: Of the 95 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained during the study period, 69 (72.63%) were resistant to imipenem. All the three phenotypic methods were equally effective in demonstrating that 100% of the imipenem resistant strains were harboring MBLs. Maximum MBL producer isolates were found in patients admitted to the ICUs (56.52%) with majority of isolates from the Medical ICU (47.82%). Maximum MBL producers were obtained from lower respiratory secretions (39.13%) followed by urine (27.52%). 100% sensitivity to Colistin and Polymixin B was observed in these MBL harboring Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Conclusion: The three phenotypic methods proved to be equally effective as a method to detect MBL production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and any one of these can be easily incorporated in routine lab procedures to detect MBLs. |
|
Keywords
: MBL, Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
|
DOI and Others
: |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
The introduction of carbapenems into clinical practice represented a great advance for the treatment of beta -lactam resistant bacteria. The carbapenems have been the drugs of choice for treatment of infections caused by penicillins or cephalosporin –resistant gram negative bacilli because of their broad spectrum of activity and stability to hydrolysis by most beta lactamases (1). However, this scenario has changed with the emergence of carbapenem resistant strains especially in the non- fermenting gram negative bacilli (NFGNB) such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp (2). Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing Metallo-β- lactamases was first reported from Japan in 1991 and since then these have been described from various parts of the world including Asia, Europe, Australia, South America and North America [3,4] Metallo –β-lactamases belong to the Ambler class B and have the ability to hydrolyze a wide variety of beta lactam agents, such as penicillins, cephalosporins and carbapenems but not monobactams (5). MBLs can be divided into six categories according to their molecular structure namely IMP, VIM, GIM, SIM, SPM and AIM. These enzymes require zinc for their catalytic activity and are inhibited by metal chelators, such EDTA and thiol compounds (6). MBL producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates have been reported as important causes of nosocomial infections and have been associated with clonal spread (7). Thus, early detection of MBL producing organisms is of great importance for the prevention of their inter and intra- hospital dissemination. Several phenotypic methods are available for the detection of MBL producing bacteria. All these methods are based on the ability of metal chelators, such as EDTA and thiolbased compounds to inhibit the activity of MBLs. These tests include the double disk synergy tests using EDTA with ceftazidime(CAZ) or Imipenem(IMP),2-mercapto propionic acid with IMP or CAZ, Hodge test, a combined disk test using EDTA with CAZ or IMP, the MBL test E test and a microdilution method using EDTA and 1,10-phenanthroline with IMP (8). The present study was undertaken to detect the prevalence of MBL in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated at a tertiary care private hospital in Jaipur, Rajasthan and to evaluate the accuracy of three phenotypic tests -disc potentiation test, double disc synergy test and thiol based compound test for the detection of MBLs in P. aeruginosa isolates.
|
|
|
Material and Methods |
|
After due approval from the Institutional Review Board, a study was carried out in Microbiology lab of a tertiary care private hospital in Jaipur to detect the production of Metallo beta lactamase (MBL) in clinical isolates of Psuedomonas aeruginosa. No duplicate isolates were included in this study. These isolates were collected over a period of 8 months from April to November 2010. Identification of bacterial isolates: All samples (except urine) received in the Microbiology lab were initially cultured on Sheep blood agar, Mac Conkey agar and Thioglycollate broth and incubated for 24-48 hours at 37°C under aerobic conditions. Urine samples were cultured on to CLED (Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient) agar. Blood samples were collected in commercial BACTEC vials for automated culture on the BACTEC 9050 system (Sparks, Maryland, U.S.A). Oxidase test was performed to detect the isolates suspicious of being Pseudomonas species. Microscan auto Scan- 4 identification and susceptibility system (Siemens, West Sacramento, California, USA) was used for organism identification and sensitivity testing. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 25923 was used as control strain. All imipenem resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa were tested for production of Metallo – β - lactamase production by three phenotypic methods- (i) Disc potentiation test (ii) Double disc synergy test (iii) Thiol based compound test. Test for detection of Metallo Beta Lactamase: (I) Disc Potentiation test (9) A 0.5 M EDTA solution (by dissolving 186.1 g of disodium EDTA.2H2O in 1000 ml of distilled water and adjusting it to pH 8.0 using NaOH) was prepared and was sterilized by autoclaving. The test organism was swabbed onto plates of Mueller Hinton agar plate. Two 10 μg imipenem discs and two 10 μg meropenem discs were placed on inoculated plates and 5 μl of EDTA solution was added to one imipenem and one meropenem disc. The zone of inhibition around imipenem and meropenem discs alone and those with EDTA was recorded and compared after 16-18 hour incubation at 35°C. An increase in zone size of at least 7 mm around the imipenem-EDTA disc and meropenem-EDTA discs was recorded as a positive result [Table/Fig-1]. (II) Double Disc synergy test (10) Test strain was suspended to the turbidity of a McFarland no. 0.5 tube and used to swab inoculate a Mueller–Hinton agar plate. After drying, a 10-µg imipenem disc and a blank filter paper disc were placed 10 mm apart from edge to edge, and 10 µL of 0.5 M EDTA solution was then applied to the blank disc, which resulted in approximately 1.5 mg/disc. After overnight incubation, the presence of an enlarged zone of inhibition around the blank disc was interpreted as EDTA-synergy test positive [Table/Fig-2]. (III) Thiol based compound test (11) A colony of each bacterial strain was suspended and diluted with Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth to 106 CFU/ml and spread onMueller Hinton agar plate with a cotton swab according to the protocol recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Two commercially supplied discs, each containing 30 μ g of CAZ (Himedia), were then placed on the plates. The distance between the two CAZ discs was kept at about 4 to 5 cm, and a filter disc was placed near one of the CAZ discs within a center-to-center distance of 1.0 to 2.5 cm. Two to five micro liters of 0.5 M EDTA solution was added to the filter disc on the agar, and each agar plate was incubated at 37°C overnight. The zone of inhibition between CAZ and blank disc with EDTA were compared, the presence of an enlarged zone of inhibition in blank disc with EDTA was interpreted as positive result [Table/Fig-3].
|
|
|
Results |
|
A total of 95 isolates of P.aeruginosa were collected from various clinical specimens over the study period. 69(72.63%) isolates were found to be resistant to imipenem. These 69 imipenem resistant isolates were tested for MBL production using three different phenotypic tests: double disc synergy test, disc potentiation test and thiol based compound test. MBL production was detected in all 69 (100%) Imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains by each of the three phenotypic test methods. OPD (outpatient department) specimens shared 2.90% of MBL producers and IPD (in patient department) specimens shared 97.10 % MBL producer P.aeruginosa isolates. In the IPD, maximum MBL producer P. aeruginosa isolates were found in patients admitted to the ICUs-Intensive care units (56.52%). [Table/Fig-4] shows the gender wise distribution of patients yielding Pseudomonas aeruginosa in their clinical specimens. 81.05% of the total Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were obtained from male patients and 18.95% from female patients. [Table/Fig-5] shows the age distribution of patients yielding Pseudomonas aeruginosa in their clinicalspecimens. Maximum MBL production was found in isolates obtained from patients in the age group 51-60 years. [Table/Fig-6] demonstrates the frequency distribution of MBL producer Pseudomonas aeruginosa from various clinical specimens. Maximum MBL producer P.aeruginosa were isolated from lower respiratory secretions (39.13%) followed by urine (27.52%). [Table/Fig-7] shows the antibiotic sensitivity profile of MBL producer Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. 100% sensitivity to Colistin and Polymixin B was observed.
|
|
|
Discussion |
|
Carbapenems are often used as last resort antibiotics for treating infections caused by multidrug resistant gram negative bacilli as they are stable and respond only to extended spectrum and Amp C- β lactamases (12). However, there has been increasing reports of resistant to this life saving antimicrobials in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [13,14]. Resistance to carbapenem is due to decreased outer membrane permeability, increased efflux systems, alteration of penicillin binding proteins and the production of carbapenem hydrolyzing enzymes i.e. carbapenemases. The resistance due to the production of carbapenem hydrolyzing enzymes such as metallo- beta- lactamases (MBL) may be chromosomally encoded or plasmid mediated and hence poses a threat of spread of resistance by gene transfer among gram negative bacteria (14). The occurrence of an MBL – positive isolate in a hospital setting poses a therapeutic problem as well as a serious concern for infection control management. Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing MBL was first reported in India in 2002 (15). In this study we observed MBL production in 72.63% of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Goel et al., (2013) have reported 53.85% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from ICU of a tertiary care hospital to be MBL producers (16) 11.42% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were found to harbor MBLs in another study from Gujarat (17) and 32.04% MBL production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from burn and surgical wards was noted in a recent study from Mumbai, Maharashtra (18). MBL prevalence ranging between 8-97% in Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been reported in various other Indian studies [1,8,15,19,20]. We found 100% of the imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains to be MBL producers. Our findings are consistent with those reported at a tertiary care centre in Kenya (6). Based on observations of other researchers, [21, 22,23] a likely explanation of such a finding is that other mechanisms of resistance to the carbapenems such as impermeability which arises via the loss of the Opr D porin or the up regulation of an active efflux pump system present in the cytoplasmic membrane of these organisms were totally absent at our centre. Currently there are no recommendations available from Clinical laboratory standards Institute (CLSI) or elsewhere for the detection of MBLs in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (24). A few phenotypic methods have been published for MBL detection; however, the results have shown that no method alone is able to detect all these enzymes, probably due to the genetic variability of these enzymes (25). PCR gives specific and accurate results; its use is limited to only a few laboratories because of its high cost and because of the different types of MBLs which are present worldwide (19). We evaluated three phenotypic methods: double disc synergy test, disc potentiation test (combined disc test) and thiol compound test to detect the MBL production in carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. All the three methods were equally effective in identifying MBL production. A study from New Delhi compared four phenotypic methods for screening of MBL production and reported that the combined disc method using Imipenem+EDTA was superior to DDST using Imi-EDTA (20). Another study has also reported that the Imp-EDTA combined disc diffusion test has the highest sensitivity in detecting MBLs (8). A comparative analysis of phenotypic tests for detection of MBLs reported that Combined disc test (IMP+EDTA), EDTA –Impenem Microbiological assay, imipenem-EDTA + sodium mercaptoacetic acid Double Disc Synergy test (IPM-EDTA+SMA DDST) and extended EDTA disc synergy test (eEDST) to be equally efficient for detection of MBLs in Indian clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (26). However, Tomasz et al., reported the highest percentage of positive results for detection of MBLs in P.aeruginosa was obtained using double disk synergy tests with Imipenem and EDTA (27). Similar to our findings, few studies have found that both combined disc test and double disc synergy test were equally effective in detecting MBL in imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa [19,28]. Khosravi et al., compared the Double-disk synergy test (DDST), combined disk test (CDT), and imipenem/imipenem-inhibitor (IP/IPI) E-test to evaluate their MBLs detection capability and found all three methods were shown to have a sensitivity of 100%. However, DDST was found to be the most specific of the three followed by IP/IPI E-test and CDT was the least specific (29). In this study MBL production in imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was observed in 18.84% from females and 81.15% from males. Our findings are consistent with an earlier study from coastal Karnataka which reported MBL production in 81% isolates from males and 19% isolates from females (28). Maximum MBL production was found in isolates obtained from patients in the age group 51-60 years followed by patients in the age group 71-80 years. Shobha et al., reported maximum MBL production in the isolates obtained from age group 40-75 years (28). In our study maximum MBL producer P. aeruginosa were isolated from lower respiratory secretions (39.13%) followed by urine (27.52%). Similar preponderance of MBL production in P. aeruginosa isolates from lower respiratory tract secretions has been noted by few other Indian studies [2,30]. 100% sensitivity to Colistin and Polymixin B was observed in MBL producer Pseudomonasaeruginosa isolates in our study. Similar to our findings it has been reported that in addition to resistance to all β-Lactams the MBL producing strains are frequently resistant to aminoglycosides and flouroquinolones (31).
|
|
|
Conclusion |
|
Emergence of MBLs producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in our clinical strains is alarming and reflects excessive use of carbapenem. Therefore early detection and prompt instillation of infection control measures is important to prevent spread of MBLs to other gram negative rods. Additionally it is also important to follow antibiotic restriction policies to avoid excessive use of carbapenem and other broad spectrum antibiotics. Finally to understand the epidemiology, there is a need of genetic analysis and also typing of metallo-β-lactamase enzymes.
|
|
| 1. | Hemalatha V, Sekar U, Kamat V. Detection of metallo betalactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patients. Ind J Med Res 2005; 122:148-52. | 2. | Chaudhary U, Bhaskar H, Sharma M. Imipenem-EDTA disk method for rapid identification of Metallo-β-lactamase producing gram-negative bacteria. Ind J Med Res 2008; 127:406-7. | 3. | Wantanabe M, Iyobe M, Mitsuhashi S. Transferable Imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35:147-51. | 4. | Saderi H, Karimi Z, Owlia P, Bahar MA, Bagher SM. Phenotypic detection of metallo-beta-lactamase producing Psuedomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burned patients. Iran J Path 2008; 3(1): 20-4. | 5. | Pitout JDD, Revathi G, Chow BL, Kabera B, Kairuki S, Nordmann P, et al. Metallo-β-lactamase –producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a tertiary care centre in Kenya. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14(8):755-9. | 6. | Livermore DM, Woodford N. Carbapenemases: a problem in waiting? Curr Opin Microbiol 2000; 3:489-95. | 7. | Tan J, Pitout J DD, Guttmann DSS. New and sensitive assay for determining Pseudomonas aeruginosa metallo-β-lactamase resistance to Imipenem. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46(5):1870-2. | 8. | Manoharan A, Chatterjee S, Mathai D, SARI Study group. Detection and characterization of metallo beta lactamases producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ind J Med Microbiol 2010; 28(3):241-4. | 9. | Yong D, Lee K, Yum JH, Shin HB, Rossolini SM, Chong Y. Imipenem–EDTA disk method for differentiation of metallo-β-lactamases producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3798 – 801. | 10. | Lee K, Chong Y, Shin HB, Kim YA, Yong D, Yum JH. Modified Hodge test and EDTA-disc synergy tests to screen metallo beta lactamase producing strains of Psuedomonas and Acinetobacter species. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001; 7:88-9. | 11. | Arakawa Y, Shibata N, Shibayama K, Kurokawa H, Yagi T, Fujiwara H, et al. Convenient Test for Screening Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria by Using Thiol Compounds. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38(1): 40–3. | 12. | Payne DJ, Bateson JH, Gasson BC, Proctor D, Khushi T, Farmer TH, et al. Inhibition of metallo-β-lactamases by a series of mercaptoacetic acid thiol ester derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41:135-40. | 13. | Gupta E, Mohanty S, Sood S, Dhawan B, Das BK, Kapil A. Emerging resistance to carbapenems in a tertiary care hospital in North India. Ind J Med Res 2006; 124: 95-8. | 14. | Gladstone P, Rajendran P, Brahamanand KN. Incidence of carbapenem resistant nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli from patients with respiratory infections in the intensive care unit. Ind J Med Microbiol 2005; 23:189-91. | 15. | Navneeth BV, Sridaran D, Sahay D, Belwadi M. A preliminary study of metallo beta lactamase producing Psuedomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patients. Ind J Med Res 2002; 116:264-8. | 16. | Goel V, Hogade SA, Karadesai SG. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamases,Amp C beta lactamase and Metallo beta lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in an intensive care unit in a teriary care hospital. J Sci Soc 2013;40-28. | 17. | Ahir H.R, Patel PH, Berry RA, Parmar R., Soni ST, Shah PK, et al. Prevalence of Metallo-β-lactamases Producing Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Gujarat. International Journal of Microbiology Research, 2012; 4(9):322-25. | 18. | Kumar SH, De As, Baveja SM, Gore MA. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Metallo- β-lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species in Burns and Surgical Wards in a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Lab Physicians. 2012; 4(1): 39–42. | 19. | Attal RO, Basak S, Mallick S K, Bose S. Metallobetalactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an emerging threat to clinicians. J Clin Diag Res 2010; 4:2691-6. | 20. | Behera B, Mathur P, Das A, Kapil A, Sharma V. An evaluation of four different phenotypic techniques for detection of metallo-β-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ind J Med Microbiol 2008; 26:233-7. | 21. | Livermore DM. Pseudomonas, porins, pumps and carbapenems. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 47: 247 – 250. | 22. | Quale J, Bratu S, Gupta J, Landman D. Interplay of efflux system, amp C, OprD expression in carbapenem resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:1633 – 1641. | 23. | Deshmukh DGR, Damle AS, Bajaj JK, Bhakre JB, Patwardhan NS. Metallo-β-lactamase-producing Clinical Isolates from Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital J Lab Physicians. 2011 Jul-Dec; 3(2): 93–97. | 24. | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute .Performance Standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty second Informational Supplement.M100-S22, CLSI Wayne PA: USA, 2012. | 25. | Wirth FW, Picoli SU, Cantarelli VV, Goncalves ALS, Brust FR, Santos LMO, et al . Metallo-β - lactamases -producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in two hospitals from Southern Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis 2009; 13(3):170-2. | 26. | Singh SP, Shariff M, Barua T, Thukral S.S. Comparative evaluation of phenotypic tests for identification of metallo beta lactamases producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2009; 129(6): 713-5. | 27. | Tomasz B, Aleksander D, Eugenia G. Evaluation of Different Methods for Detection of Metallo-beta-Lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates. Polish J Microbiol 2010; 59:45-8. | 28. | Shobha KL, Lenka PR, Sharma MK, Ramchandra L, Bairy I. Metallo-β-lactamase production among Pseudomonas species and Acinetobacter species in costal Karnataka. J Clin Diagn Res 2009; 3:1747-53. | 29. | Khosravi Y, Loke MF, Chua EG, Tay ST , Vadivelu J. Phenotypic Detection of Metallo-β-Lactamase in Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Scientific World Journal 2012 ; 2012:654939. | 30. | Shanthi M, Sekar U. Multi-drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii Infections among Hospitalized Patients: Risk Factors and Outcomes. JAPI 2009; 57: 636-40. | 31. | Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Metallo-β-lactamases: the quiet before the storm? Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18:306-25. [ Google Scholar]
|
|
|
TABLES AND FIGURES | |
|
|
|
|
|